Pupil Premium Strategy Statement 2021/2022
Pupil premium strategy statement
This statement details our school's use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2021 to 2022 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year's spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail | Data |
School name | Tredworth Junior School |
Number of pupils in school | 298 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 55.9% (Ever 6FSM) |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2021/2022 to 2024/2025 |
Date this statement was published | December 2021 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | July 2022 |
Statement authorised by | A. Darby Headteacher |
Pupil premium lead | P. Reedman Associate Headteacher |
Governor / Trustee lead | K Rayers |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £201,690 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £22,185 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £27,356 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year | £251,231 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
Our intention is that our pupils, irrespective of the challenges they face, will make good progress and achieve across all curriculum areas. Our pupils come from an area of high deprivation (0.32 on school deprivation indicator) and a high proportion of them are classed as disadvantaged (55.9% - double the national average). A high proportion of our pupils are also SEND (31.6%) and EAL (33.3%) compared to national averages. We aim to support all vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils including the above and those who are already high attainers. Quality first teaching is the principle strategy of our approach; proven to have the greatest impact upon closing the attainment gap but also essential to ensure all pupils, not just pupil premium, foster a love of learning, achieve goals and make progress. Our strategy is to be responsive, using comprehensive assessment tools alongside ‘progress support meetings’ to identify and monitor all pupils’ progress. Pupils can then be enrolled on a wide range of class based or school wide programmes to support pupils and help them excel. Our intervention and recovery team work across the school planning, delivering and monitoring the use of these programmes.
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Observations and School Progress and Support Meetings (PSMs) have shown under developed oral language skills and language gaps in pupils. This is evident in EAL pupils as well as English speaking pupils and is seen across the school although is particularly evident our disadvantaged pupils. |
2 | Assessments, observation and PSMs have shown disadvantaged pupils in particular have greater difficulties in phonics. This negatively impacts on their development as readers as extra effort is applied in the decoding and lost on the comprehension. The average reading age for a disadvantaged pupil in Year 5 was 1 year 3 months behind the average reading age of their peers. (July 2021 data) |
3 | Assessments, observation and PSMs have shown disadvantaged pupils in particular have greater difficulties in phonics. This negatively impacts on their development as writers and their ability to spell. The average spelling age for a disadvantaged pupil in Year 5 was 1 year 1 month behind the average spelling age of their peers. (July 2021 data) |
4 | Assessments, observations and PSMs indicate that disadvantaged pupils attainment in maths is below that of their peers. The average SAS in maths for a disadvantaged pupil in Year 5 was 6 points behind the average SAS of their peers. (July 2021 data) |
5 | Observations, PSMs and assessments have identified that many of our disadvantaged pupils have been impacted by the school closures due to the COVID pandemic. This has resulted in curriculum knowledge gaps leading to pupils falling behind their age related expectations. |
6 | Observations, PSMs and assessments (including the PASS wellbeing survey 2020) have identified that many of our disadvantaged pupils have been impacted by the school closures due to the COVID pandemic. This has resulted in more pupils requiring support in social and emotional skills and opportunities to engage with enrichment activities. |
7 | Attendance data shows that persistent absenteeism is high and pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds are disproportionately represented within this group. This absence further negatively impacts our disadvantaged pupils progress. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
| Assessment, observation and discussion will show improved oral language among disadvantaged pupils. Evidence will be gathered through book looks, lesson observations and formative assessment. |
| The gap between pupil premium pupils and non pupil premium pupils in the 2024/2025 data will be reduced. Evidence will be gathered using reading age (New Group Reading Test or similar) and end of key stage 2assessments |
| The gap between pupil premium pupils and non pupil premium pupils in the 2024/2025 data will be reduced. Evidence will be gathered using reading age (NFER or similar) and end of key stage 2 assessments |
| Increase in percentage of pupil premium pupils reaching age expected in KS2 SATs Evidence will be gathered using reading age (Progress Test in Maths or similar) and end of key stage 2 assessments |
| Assessment, observation and discussion will show improved wellbeing among all pupils as well as disadvantaged pupils. Evidence will be gathered through student voice discussions (e.g. school council, pupil/parent questionnaires) as well as teacher observations |
| Whole school pupil absence to be under 5% and persistent absence to be under 15% to be more in line with national averages |
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £94,105
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Embedding oracy skills across the whole school curriculum. Supporting pupils to articulate themselves and furthering their use of vocabulary and language through targeted quality first teaching. | Average impact of oral language interventions show an improvement of 6 additional months to S&L ages for minimal spending. Improvements are also seen in reading and writing | 1, 2 |
Purchase of a school wide approach to spelling to ensure continuity across classes focussing on spelling skills and spelling curriculums with ongoing assessments to easily monitor pupils | EEF recommends spelling should be explicitly taught to support writing. Diagnostic assessment should be used to focus effort on the spellings that pupils are finding difficult. | 3 |
Enhancement of maths curriculum and teaching. Restructuring of questioning and promotion of key vocabulary through quality first teaching
Fund teacher CPD | CPD based around the recommendations from the EEF improving mathematics in key stage 2 and 3 guidance. | 4 |
Embedding Social and Emotional learning across the whole school. Supporting pupils to label and manage emotions.
Purchase of resources to support this: Weaving Wellbeing CPD for staff | Social and emotional learning approaches have a positive impact, on average, of 4 months’ additional progress in academic outcomes over the course of an academic year.
Positive Education programme using evidence-based from the field of Positive Psychology. | 5 |
Embedding metacognition within the curriculum
Fund teacher CPD | EEF studies show primary school pupils have typically made 8 months progress in a year particularly in maths and science | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, |
Reduction of class size allowing staff to work more flexibly and intensively with smaller groups | Impact is seen when pupils have better access to teacher and teaching assistant support and are able to work in smaller groups receiving immediate oral feedback. International research suggests that class size has a positive impact on pupil’s outcomes particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged pupils | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £103,443
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Additional phonics sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils (1:1 or small groups) who require further support in phonics with intervention and recovery team | Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base that indicates a positive impact on the accuracy of word reading (though not necessarily comprehension), particularly for disadvantaged pupils Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year.
| 2, 3 |
Additional Rapid reading sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils (1:1) who require further support in reading with intervention and recovery team | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils | 2, |
Additional Rapid writing sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils (1:3) who require further support in the basics of writing with intervention and recovery team | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. | 3, |
Additional Rapid maths sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils (1:3) who require further support in the basics of writing with intervention and recovery team | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. | 4, |
Additional TA time to allow 1:1 support sessions in class using; Precision Teaching, Toe by Toe, Fine Motor Skills, Barrier Games, Pre-Tutoring of Language, Daily Reading to an Adult, EAL language support (first 1000 words etc), Rising Stars Maths etc | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils | 2, 3 |
Additional small group recovery sessions in Maths and English across the key stage with intervention and recovery team | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils Small group tuition has an average impact of four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. | 2, 3, 4 |
Purchase of EducationCity to allow pupils to access additional learning at home and create personalised revision guides to help support themselves in learning and filling curriculum gaps
Provide technology for disadvantaged pupils to access | Homework is shown to have a positive impact when aligned to learning in class and when feedback can be given 1:1 tuition using digital technologies show improved progress | 2, 3, 4 |
Purchase of Nessy to support disadvantaged pupils in spelling and phonics
Technology easily accessible in each classroom so pupils can login to Nessy whenever required | Specific needs and gaps targeted regularly can be an effective method for supporting low attaining pupils 1:1 tuition using digital technologies show improved progress | 2 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £53,683
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Provide targeted focus work with families to enable them to support their children’s learning and well-being Provide integrated and systematic pastoral support with pastoral lead | Guidance taken from EEF Working with parents to support children’s learning recommendations | 5, 6 |
Provide in-depth learning reviews and set agreed targets between pupils, parents and teachers CPD and support meeting time to be covered | Guidance taken from EEF Working with parents to support children’s learning recommendations | 1 - 7 |
Provide additional opportunities (clubs, play nurture sessions and social skills interventions) to disadvantaged pupils to allow them to develop their skills, gain wider enrichment experiences, promote wellbeing and engagement with school | EEF reports on a link between physical activity and academic performance. Evidence also suggests that involvement in extra-curricular activities may increase pupil attendance and retention. | 6, 7 |
Whole school training with Educational Psychology on behaviour management e.g. EASI PACK | EEF findings support universal approaches and targeted interventions focusing on self-management have a positive effect to reduce disruption | 6, 7 |
Embedding principles of good practice set out in the DfE’s Improving School Attendance advice. CPD for staff | The DfE guidance has been informed by engagement with schools that have significantly reduced levels of absence and persistent absence. | 7 |
Contingency fund for acute issues.
| Based on our experiences and those of similar schools to ours, we have identified a need to set a small amount of funding aside to respond quickly to needs that have not yet been identified. | All |
Total budgeted cost: £251,231
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2020 to 2021 academic year.
All children were significantly impacted by the COVID 2019-2020 school closures; our assessments indicate that disadvantaged pupils, EAL pupils and SEND pupils were particularly affected by the disruptions to learning. Pupil premium funded interventions to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils were not able to have the full impact intended. Remote learning and close communication with parents were not able to fully replicate the impact of quality first teaching and targeted intervention that was planned. However, the establishment of the intervention and recovery team (pupil premium and recovery funded) and initial assessments carried out (mid-year) enabled us to target pupils to make accelerated progress and recovery in terms 4 and 5. |
Externally provided programmes
Programme | Provider |
Nessy Spelling | Nessy Learning |
Education City | Edmentum |
Weaving Wellbeing | Pearson |